There are certain things that can make a strategy game good. One is interesting maps filled with different approaches, tactical elements that can provide boons or penalties, and interesting ambiance. Engaging units that really make you think about how you can customize them or best use them in various situations is another good one. Especially if you can pick and choose squad members. A well-thought out story with thoughtful lore and motivations for fighting can be great. Also, you can?t neglect great AI that pushes you to be better.
Unfortunately, 1971 Project Helios doesn?t have any of those things. Its maps aren?t interesting or challenging. I never cared about any of the units or their advancement options. The story is barely there and there?s no real motivation to search for the clippings that add more ?lore.? Also, the AI often boils down to either hitting the enemy closest to the foe or the ally who has the lowest health.
PB = PB || {};
PB.gptStandAlone = PB.gptStandAlone || {};
PB.gptAutoRefresh = PB.gptAutoRefresh || {'gptAds':[], 'gptStandAlone':[]};
admiralCookie = readAdmiralCookie();

googletag.cmd.push(function() {
var standAloneSizeMapping = googletag.sizeMapping().addSize([0, 0], []).addSize([750, 0], [[300, 250]]).addSize([980, 0], [[300, 250]]).build(); PB.gptStandAlone['ros_300x250_p_slot4_1592056208'] = googletag.defineSlot('/4403/cr/playstationlifestyle/ros', [[300, 250]], 'ros_300x250_p_slot4_15...